Community Engagement Resources

Colorful GIF image of many people in a circle holding hands

The framework and resources presented below have been developed and collected as part of an ongoing project, “Improving FGM/C Healthcare and Clinical Guidelines Through Community Engagement and Leadership.”  

The aims of this project include:

  • Provide a rational for community engagement in FGM/C healthcare and policy-making
  • Propose an adaptable framework for effective community engagement to improve health outcomes
  • Connect service providers to resources, community-based organizations, and ongoing engagement efforts

This is just one aspect of a larger collaboration supported by a Complex Moral Problems grant (Georgetown University) and led by Ranit Mishori, MD, MHS, FAAFP (Department of Family Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine), Rebecca Reingold, JD (The O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University), and Kevin T. FitzGerald, SJ, PhD, PhD (Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics, Georgetown University Medical Center), that aims to help clinicians address complex medical-ethical-legal issues related to FGM/C.  

Elements of Effective Engagement

The ongoing efforts to address FGM/C and to improve refugee and immigrant health are multidisciplinary and diverse. We looked at a broad set of organizations that work with those at risk of and survivors of FGM/C, refugee and immigrant populations, as well as resources on community engagement (see “Ongoing Efforts, Organizations, and Resources”).   Recognizing the importance of multifaceted and collaborative approaches to improving health outcomes, we present our findings as a set of elements that could be found across many different contexts. Programming and community engagement tended to include a focus on communication & dialogue, work within the health sector, and forming sustainable partnerships.  Neither the elements presented, nor the list of organizations and resources listed in the next section are intended to be exhaustive.  Rather, they represent the beginnings of an adapatable framework for addressing FGM/C that can be applied in a variety of contexts, and an attempt to connect service providers to helpful resources and organizations.

Ongoing Efforts, Organizations, and Resources


Community-based: Education, Training

Advocacy and Support

Legal Services

Community Engagement Resources


Abdulcadir J, Rodriguez MI, Say L. Research gaps in care of women with FGM: an analysis.  BJOG. 2015; 122(3): 294-303. Barret H, Brown K, Alhassan Y, and Beecham D.  The REPLACE Approach: Supporting Communities to end FGM in the EU. Coventry University.  2015. Boucher M.  “Follow the Leader: Supporting Refugee Efforts to Self-Organize.”  Center for Refugee Health.  Conference. 2014. Carey R.  Female Genital Mutilation and Cutting (FGM/C).  Office of Refugee Resettlement.  US Department of Health and Human Services.  State Letter.  15-08.  24 July 2015. Coleman DL.  The Seattle Compromise: Multicultural Sensitivity and Americanization.  Duke Law Journal.  1998; 47: 717. Darby R.  Moral Hypocrisy or Intellectual Inconsistency? A Historical Perspective on Our Habit of Placing Male and Female Genital Cutting in Separate Ethical Boxes.  Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal.  2016; 26(2): 153-163. Earp BD.  Between Moral Relativism and Moral Hypocrisy.  Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal.  2016; 26(2): 105-144. Elsayed DEM, Elamin RM, and Sulaiman SM.  Female Genital Mutilation and Ethical Issues.  Sudanese Journal of Public Health.  2011; 6(2): 63-67. Hearst AA and Molnar AM.  Female Genital Cutting: An Evidence-Based Approach to Clinical Management for the Primary Care Physician.  Mayo Clinic Proceedings.  2013; 88 (6): 618-629. Ireland A.  “Addressing post-resettlement needs in an urban setting.”  Center for Refugee Health. Louden K.  AAP Retracts Controversial Policy on Female Genital Cutting.  Medscape.  2 Jun 2010. Nelson JL.  Relativists and Hypocrites: Earp on Genital Cutting.  Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal.  2016; 26(2): 165-172. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.  Community engagement overview.  2017. Raising Voices.  SASA! Mobilizing Communities to Inspire Social Change.  2013.!.pdf Reproductive Health Uganda. Scottish Community Development Centre. Shweder RA.  Equality Now in Genital Reshaping: Brian Earp’s Search for Moral Consistency.  Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal.  2016; 26(2): 145-154. US Government Accountability Office.  Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: Existing Federal Efforts to Increase Awareness Should be Improved.  Report to the Honorable Harry Reid, Minority Leader, US Senate.  GAO-16-645.  June 2016. WHO.  Eliminating female genital mutilation: An interagency statement.  WHO.  2008. Wilkinson D.  Cultural relativism and female genital mutilation.  Practical Ethics Blog.  University of Oxford.  7 Feb 2014. Younge M.  “Complex Collaborations: Public, Private and Non-Profits Working (happily!) Together.”  Center for Refugee Health.